Do you have a facility to clean? Are you interested in cooperation?
Write to us.

Do you have a facility to clean? Are you interested in cooperation?
Write to us.

Traditional cleaning means risk and disruption

DRONE CLEANING AND WASHING

Global AeroCleaning Solutions™ designs and develops proprietary UAV systems for operations on façades, rooftops, and PV installations. We deliver solutions that enhance operational safety and ensure a repeatable, controlled process. Our focus is precision, safety, and B2B implementations.

A REVOLUTION IN HIGH-RISE FACILITY CLEANING

Global AeroCleaning Solutions™ introduces a new approach to the maintenance of façades, rooftops, and PV installations. We do not offer another service but a method of execution that changes the rules. We move critical operations into the air and eliminate what makes traditional methods heavy and risky. Instead of scaffolding, ropes, and lifts, you get a controlled process from a safe zone. Instead of disruption around the building, you get order, a schedule, and a clearly defined scope. Instead of risk to people, you get operations managed from the ground. We operate in a B2B model where predictability and standards matter. Every facility is treated as a technical project, not a one-off job. This system was created to remove the burden of organizational chaos from you. As a result, planning becomes easier, budget control improves, and decisions are easier to justify to management. This is the difference between a method and improvisation. This is the difference you notice from day one.

TECHNOLOGY BUILT ON THREE PILLARS

SAFETY

DCS represents a new approach to maintaining façades, roofs, and PV installations. We do not sell another service. We introduce a method of execution that changes the rules of the game. We move critical operations into the air and eliminate what is difficult and risky in traditional methods. Instead of scaffolding, lifts, and rope access, you get a controlled process within a safe zone. Instead of disorder around the building, you get structure, a schedule, and a clearly defined scope. Instead of risk to people, you get an operation conducted from the ground.

We operate in a B2B model where predictability and standards matter. Each facility is treated as a technical project, not as a random job order. This system exists to remove organizational chaos from your side. As a result, planning becomes easier, budget control becomes simpler, and internal decision making becomes easier to justify. This is the difference between a method and improvisation. A difference visible from the first day of cooperation.

CONTROL

Before we begin any work, we define the scope, priorities, and execution timeline. We establish exactly which areas are covered and what criteria determine completion. The process is conducted in a repeatable way, allowing us to maintain consistent quality across different facilities.

By performing operations from the air, we reduce the number of variables on site and simplify organization. The operator monitors the entire process from a controlled scheme. During the qualification stage, we use remote data to assess conditions and prepare the plan in advance. During execution, we maintain order within the work zone and minimize interference with the facility’s operation.

After completion, we provide a summary that organizes the completed scope and facilitates settlement. Documentation becomes a reference point for future maintenance and planned service cycles. Control means you know what will happen, within what scope, and what the outcome will be.

PREDICTABILITY

We operate according to a process that begins with facility qualification and ends with documentation of completed work. The scope and schedule are defined before entering the site to limit changes during execution. By moving work into the air, we shorten preparation time and reduce dependency on heavy logistics. In many cases, the facility can operate normally, which simplifies planning on the client side.

Predictability results from the fact that we rely on repeatable standards rather than one off solutions created on the fly. We select the method according to facility conditions, reducing the risk of incorrect assumptions and rework. Communication is based on facts, scope, and conditions, not on general declarations.

After completion, we deliver a summary and documentation that clearly closes the process. This makes it easier to plan future maintenance cycles and budget activities in the long term. Predictability means fewer surprises, shorter approvals, and smoother organization on the facility side.

INNOVATION
SPEED
ECOLOGY

We perform cleaning of high rise facilities in corporate and industrial environments. We primarily service high rise buildings, office buildings, and large commercial facilities, as well as technical and industrial sites.

SERVICES BASED ON DCS TECHNOLOGY

The DCS offer includes drone based operations such as cleaning, disinfection, and inspection. We execute projects on facilities where organization and safety are critical, including high rise buildings, office buildings, large façades, and technical installations.
Drone based disinfection enables rapid coverage of large and hard to access areas. It is effective in large scale environments such as stadiums, arenas, event halls, and sports facilities.
We conduct inspections and visual documentation of high rise facilities and technical infrastructure. Drone based inspection allows rapid condition assessment without working at height and without interrupting ongoing operations.
The DCS franchise is a model for partners who want to launch drone services in their market under a unified operational standard. We provide know how, operational procedures, and support during launch and growth. Our focus is on a repeatable process and scalable B2B operations.
We supply DCS solutions for companies that want to operate their own aerial cleaning and inspection services. We configure the system to real working conditions and provide team training along with maintenance procedures.

WHY ARE DRONE SERVICES THE FUTURE?

OPERATIONAL SAFETY

No people working at height. The operation is conducted by a pilot from a safe location, and the risk on site is minimal.
ACCESS TO HARD TO REACH AREAS
Compared to rope access services, we reduce execution time on site because we operate from the air without staged rope work.
MINIMAL INTERFERENCE WITH THE FACILITY
The drone operates from the air, so on site organization remains simple. The facility can operate normally during execution.

FASTER EXECUTION

Difficult access does not block execution. Instead of building logistical workarounds, we operate directly from the air.
LOWER COSTS

Cost is not only labor, but also downtime and organization. We reduce both.

 

ECOLOGY

Less water, less chemicals, less operational waste. Sustainability results from the technology and the organization of the process.

 

POST EXECUTION DOCUMENTATION AND CYCLICAL MAINTENANCE

After completion, we provide post execution documentation that clearly closes the subject and is suitable for internal circulation within the organization. The report describes the scope of work performed and identifies the zones that were covered by cleaning, leaving no room for assumptions. We include before and after photographic material taken from the same angles and comparable perspectives to allow easy evaluation of results. We mark the execution date, operational conditions, and key process parameters that influence the outcome. We indicate sensitive elements and areas that required more careful handling to support planning of future maintenance activities. If specific types of contamination occur on the facility, we describe their characteristics and recommend the appropriate cleaning method. The report also organizes operational aspects such as working time, stage sequence, and any interruptions caused by external conditions. This makes settlement easier and decisions on the client side easier to justify before administration or management. The documentation becomes a reference point for future operations without the need to start from scratch. This is a standard that eliminates chaos and turns the service into a measurable process.
We treat cyclical maintenance as a plan rather than a one time intervention. After the first execution, we propose a schedule based on the real conditions of the facility. We analyze the rate of contamination buildup and environmental factors affecting façades, roofs, and PV installations to determine the appropriate frequency of operations. We define zone priorities, as not every part of the facility requires the same level of maintenance, which allows budget optimization. We predefine the scope of subsequent cycles, their timing, and acceptance criteria to minimize the need for additional arrangements. This allows facility management to include activities in the calendar and avoid sudden, costly actions under time pressure. In many cases, cyclical operations shorten the time required to enter the site because we already have a zone map and a proven operational scheme. We also reduce the risk of contamination becoming permanent and requiring more aggressive methods. From a B2B perspective, maintenance becomes predictable rather than reactive, which simplifies budgeting and reporting. After each cycle, we update the documentation and compare results so the client can see a trend rather than a one time effect. In practice, this means fewer surprises, shorter approvals, and smoother organization on the facility side.

FORMAL COMPLIANCE AND OPERATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

Each execution begins with a clear definition of roles and responsibilities on both sides. Global AeroCleaning Solutions™ is responsible for operation preparation, method selection, work zone organization, and aerial execution. The client is responsible only for providing access to the facility and basic technical information. This division eliminates misunderstandings and shortens arrangements. In the documentation, we indicate the decision maker on the facility side and the coordinating person on our side. As a result, communication is fast and does not become diluted across administrative departments. The scope of work is described in a closed form, preventing additional expectations from being added during execution. Any change in scope requires confirmation to maintain organizational and financial order. This working model is clear for technical departments, administration, and management. Responsibility is not implied but written and transparent. This simplifies cooperation in corporate environments.

Before execution, we collect the set of information required for safe and compliant operation on site. We define site entry rules, working hours, and any limitations resulting from building operations. We verify whether additional administrative notifications or internal approvals are required. We determine zones that must be temporarily marked or excluded from use. We provide a clear list of organizational requirements so that facility administration can implement them quickly. As a result, the execution day does not begin with improvisation or stressful arrangements. All agreements are documented and confirmed before the work date. This approach shortens the time spent on site and reduces the involvement of the client’s personnel. Formalities are organized in advance rather than resolved during execution. This provides organizational peace and predictability.

The settlement method is directly linked to the agreed scope and the documentation of completed work. The client knows exactly which area and which result they are paying for because it refers to the post execution report. We do not use general service descriptions but refer to specific zones and actions. Documents are prepared in a way that is clear for accounting and administrative departments. This makes the invoice approval process faster and free of additional explanations. If the execution is divided into stages, each stage has its own clear summary. Transparency eliminates doubts and reduces the need for additional correspondence after completion. The client receives a complete set of information necessary for archiving and internal control. This settlement model aligns with the expectations of companies that operate in a process driven manner and require order in documentation.

LIMITATIONS OF TRADITIONAL METHODS IN LARGE FACILITIES

In large facilities, the main limitation is not the cleaning itself but the infrastructure required to even begin the work. Scaffolding and lifts require parking space, stable ground, access routes, and often temporary exclusion of parts of the area. If the facility has an irregular shape, recessed façades, canopies, or internal courtyards, access stops being simple and turns into a series of technical workarounds. Additional arrangements are required with security, property management, and tenants because equipment must be positioned in specific locations. In practice, the scope of work starts to depend on where equipment can be placed rather than on what actually requires cleaning. This creates gaps in execution and the need for repeated site visits. The larger the building, the more often access becomes the main limitation of the entire project. This issue exists regardless of service price because it results from the facility geometry and the surrounding space. For this reason, traditional methods in large facilities are difficult to plan as a coherent operation.
With traditional methods, the final result is often inconsistent because work is performed in stages and under varying conditions. Different shifts, different days, and different conditions lead to visible differences on large surfaces. Some zones are cleaned from a distance when access is difficult, which reduces repeatability. In buildings with mixed façades, the issue intensifies because each surface reacts differently. Work acceptance becomes debatable because it is difficult to compare results achieved at different times. Large facilities require a standard that ensures a consistent effect across the entire structure, which traditional methods often fail to provide.
Modern façades include elements sensitive to direct contact and uncontrolled tool handling. With lifts and rope access, the risk of accidental abrasion, scratches, and damage to façade joints increases. Water and cleaning agents may enter areas that should not be exposed, especially around windows and installations. In large facilities, the scale of repetitive movements statistically increases the risk of error. This makes traditional methods harder to justify where damage risk minimization is critical.

HOW DOES OUR COOPERATION LOOK?

BUILDINGS

FACILITIES

INDUSTRY

STRUCTURES